Asia
Like India, Nepal has no domestic asylum law and isn't a party to the Refugee Convention. It has long tolerated a large Tibetan refugee population and hosted Bhutanese refugees for decades, but has grown more restrictive about new arrivals, particularly under pressure from China regarding Tibetans.
Not tourist facts — the things that actually shape daily life while your case is pending and after it's decided.
There is no legal asylum procedure to describe. Long-settled Tibetan refugees operate under a decades-old, informal arrangement with the government that newer arrivals cannot fully rely on — Nepal has restricted the transit of newly arriving Tibetans in recent years under diplomatic pressure. For other nationalities, UNHCR registration is the main available mechanism, without conferring formal legal status.
There is no government asylum procedure to apply to. Tibetan long-stayers and Bhutanese refugees receive Nepal-government documentation under a decades-old arrangement; other nationalities go through UNHCR's own mandate registration instead.
UNHCR conducts its own registration and refugee status determination, but this doesn't confer legal status recognized by the Nepali government.
The Bhutanese refugee camps that existed for decades were mostly resolved through a large third-country resettlement program (largely to the US) between 2007 and 2016, not through integration in Nepal — worth knowing this wasn't really a 'Nepal accepted them' story so much as a 'the world eventually resettled them elsewhere' story. Over half of the wider refugee population in Nepal holds no government identity documentation at all, which formally excludes them from most rights and services — the government treats UNHCR-mandate refugees outside the Tibetan and Bhutanese groups as "illegal migrants" under immigration law, not as a protected category.